<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Syngineering Projects &#187; Membrane Bio Reactors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects/tag/membrane-bio-reactors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects</link>
	<description>Water Treatment Engineers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:44:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.35</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comparing MBR &amp; SBR Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects/comparing-mbr-sbr-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects/comparing-mbr-sbr-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Membrane Bio Reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse osmosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequenced Bio Reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While there are similarities between MBR and SBR (both are forms of the activated sludge process), there is one fundamental difference – the method of separating the mixed liquor from the treated wastewater.  SBR technology relies on gravity settling (or phase separation), while MBR technology uses the membrane as a physical barrier for separation.  On [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">While there are similarities between MBR and SBR (both are forms of the activated sludge process), there is one fundamental difference – the method of separating the mixed liquor from the treated wastewater.  SBR technology relies on gravity settling (or phase separation), while MBR technology uses the membrane as a physical barrier for separation.  On the surface this may seem like a subtle difference, however, by using a physical barrier for separation, MBR technology provides numerous advantages.</span></p>
<p><strong>Click here for more detail </strong><a href="http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Syngineering-Water-MBR-vs-SBR.pdf">Comparing MBR and SBR Technologies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.syngineering.com.au/projects/comparing-mbr-sbr-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
